quyn
- nou venit -
 Offline
Gender: 
Age: 21
Location: london
Posts: 11
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: March 03, 2008, 02:17:32 PM » |
|
I understand what you're saying is a shame you can't read romanian though...  ...you would understand what I mean if you could read all the subjects on this forum. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mrskull
|
|
« Reply #31 on: March 13, 2008, 12:33:24 PM » |
|
Dear all,
I am applying for ILR and I have received a letter from the HO requesting some further documentation and I am seeking for help and advice to a request that seems idiotic.
Before this, I need to clarify that I was paying rent to my landlord on a monthly basis via a standing order from my Halifax bank account to her Natwest account. The tenancy contract was included in the application file, of course, together with a confirmation from my landlord that I am her tenant, stipulating the rent amount, etc.
However this is what I got from the caseworker:
"In order to help us consider the case please provide:
Documentary evidence, provided by Natwest, explaining the nature of the £amount standing order payment from your halifax account."
What the hell is that supposed to mean? How could I get this info from a bank account that is not even mine? And the bank will not give you and will not know what that amount represents anyway. Is this some technical mumbo-jumbo that I don't understand? What do you think I need to provide?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
UKOK
|
|
« Reply #32 on: March 13, 2008, 02:08:44 PM » |
|
just go online, go in to your account, to the standing order, and give it a print screen.
You can also request from your bank a letter that explains what that standing order is for. It's simple.
Their request is as idiotic as ever, but just get it done and move on.
Why don't you try calling them first and bringing their attention to the rental contract and the name of your landlady. Maybe that way they'll connect the dots......idiots!
And somebody on this forum was lecturing us once how educated and capable these mofos are.....what a joke
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Somnul unei natiuni naste monstrii"
|
|
|
|
mrskull
|
|
« Reply #33 on: March 13, 2008, 02:48:54 PM » |
|
Thanks UKOK but read carefully what they are requesting: something from Natwest, not from Halifax, they want something from my landlord's account rather than from my account.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PoliceOfficer
- veteran -
Offline
Gender: 
Age: 23
Location: Aberdeen SCOTLAND
Posts: 750
|
|
« Reply #34 on: March 13, 2008, 03:16:09 PM » |
|
mrskull,
I understand what your problem is, but, like UKOK said, you must to do the right thing, just get it done and move on.
Maibe if you will speak with your landlord, and you will explain the problem, and tell her that the idiots from Home Office want this information about the transaction between your bank account and her`s account regarding the paying rent fees, maibe she will understand and try to speak with somebody from her bank, and give you this evidence. In my opinion, this it`s the only thing that you can do.
I don`t understand them, all the officers from HO, they are bloody stupid... i really can`t undestand them. Or ... you can try to call them, and explain the situation, and tell them that you can provide an official document from your bank, but not from your landlord bank, because it`s not your account and you don`t have accest to a bnk accpunt that it`s not yours (maibe they don`t know that .... idiots ! ).
You can try ....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All human actions have one or more of these seven causes: chance, nature, compulsions, habit, reason, passion, desire.
ARISTOTLE
|
|
|
|
mrskull
|
|
« Reply #35 on: March 13, 2008, 03:42:00 PM » |
|
Thanks
I am doing all these things.
But they are idiots. This is just one of the requests but they have others too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
UKOK
|
|
« Reply #36 on: March 14, 2008, 10:06:05 AM » |
|
Just keep on pushing man, the ending is in sight. I understand fully how frustrating it is, but once it's done, it's done. "Break a leg" as they say. And maybe you should post this here as well, and contact DST http://www.romani-online.co.uk/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,216/topic,1084.0/ |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 14, 2008, 10:11:54 AM by UKOK »
|
Logged
|
"Somnul unei natiuni naste monstrii"
|
|
|
DST
- junior -
Offline
Posts: 55
|
|
« Reply #37 on: March 14, 2008, 02:09:30 PM » |
|
Mr Skull, the request you received does clearly seem to be in error.
Of course it could be a simple human error - switching the order of the bank accounts (even though they had requested the other information before) - so it is not necessarily a deliberate attempt to delay your application.
My view is that the complexity and structure of the application form and processes makes simple mistakes more likely - error is designed into the system.
This is the line of argument that I am looking to push.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mrskull
|
|
« Reply #38 on: March 14, 2008, 05:46:17 PM » |
|
Yes, DST, even though in this case I don't think it was a mistake as they clearly stated what they want. I spoke to a lawyer who explained me that what they want is impossible to get anyway, I will get them letters from the landlord proving that the amount represents the rent. I do not think it is a deliberate attempt to delay the application but only an attempt to not grant ILR if they can. Of course, this will not happen. The caseworker is an overworked, frustrated individual and that is why his/her requests are unclear and invalid, at the same time representing the main kick and arousal that him/her gets by playing God.
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mrskull
|
|
« Reply #39 on: April 15, 2008, 11:17:08 AM » |
|
Just so you know, I got my ILR yesterday. It took 5 months. During this process, I was asked to provide some additional documents which from the law's perspective are not relevant to the application. However, after providing all they requested, they had no other choice than grant the ILR. I wish all of you who go through this process best of luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PoliceOfficer
- veteran -
Offline
Gender:
Age: 23
Location: Aberdeen SCOTLAND
Posts: 750
|
|
« Reply #40 on: April 15, 2008, 11:37:45 AM » |
|
Ohohoho !!!
Very very good job man ! Well done !!!!
Like UKOK said, we must keep on pushing !
Well done again !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All human actions have one or more of these seven causes: chance, nature, compulsions, habit, reason, passion, desire.
ARISTOTLE
|
|
|
|
motanik
|
|
« Reply #41 on: April 15, 2008, 11:41:25 AM » |
|
Mrskull  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mrskull
|
|
« Reply #42 on: April 15, 2008, 12:59:09 PM » |
|
Thanks!!  On another note, if my passport expires, can I transfer the stamp somehow or will I just have to carry the old passport around? I know it's off topic, sorry |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
motanik
|
|
« Reply #43 on: April 15, 2008, 01:03:19 PM » |
|
You carry the old passport, it's the easiest way.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Negrutxa
Moderator Forum
- veteran -
Offline
Gender:
Age: 27
Posts: 1 240
|
|
« Reply #44 on: May 09, 2008, 01:06:42 PM » |
|
Hi DST Please see below the amended law in November 2007. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/em/uksiem_20073012_en.pdfMr MacMillan's response to one of our members (dacaunico) regarding if he/she sould apply for a blue certificate as dependent of self employed person was: No,if you are exempt by being the spouse of a person exercising Treaty Right you are not required to possess a registration certificate to confirm that there are no restriction on your taking employment in the uk Home Office is misleading on the phone different employers that the dependent of a self employed person should possess the blue certificate as a proof of their unrestricted work rights and employers are just now aware of the real situation! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Just be.
|
|
|
|
May 2008
We have 10 guests and 10 members online 
